Recovery and Common Sense.
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Recovery and Common Sense Reasoning: Principles of Nonmonotonic Theory Recovery
We use common-sense reasoning to make predictions about what normally will be the case. Such reasoning is captured by using a nonmonotonic semantics selecting a set of intended models from a larger collection of models. Such a selection process, however, might fail: although a theory might have a nonempty set of non-intended models, the set of intended models might be empty. We call such a theo...
متن کاملCommon sense and "relevance"
Introduction The "relevance" logicians of North America and the "relevant" logicians of the Antipodes have long claimed that their logical systems are in better agreement with common sense than is classical logic. The present paper is a critical examination of such claims. Though it is part of an on-going debate between classical and relevantistic logicians, I have tried to keep my discussion o...
متن کاملCommon Sense and Nonsense
The irrepressible Bernard E. Rollin has written a lively, provocative, and scholarly book on several pivotal bioethical issues in nonhuman animal research. Professor Rollin of Colorado State University asksand answers whether nonhuman animals think, feel, and suffer. Rollin asks whether the prevailing scientific justification for banning nonhuman animals is based on rational assessment of the i...
متن کاملCommon Sense
I like your columns, but they’re really all just common sense,” a client told me. He didn’t have a software background, and my columns were his first introduction to systematic ways of understanding software projects. To my chagrin, the net effect of a well-written column appeared to be that he thought software engineering was trivial! The idea that good software engineering “is all just common...
متن کاملCharacter, Common-sense, and Expertise
Gilbert Harman has argued that the common-sense characterological psychology employed in virtue ethics is rooted not in unbiased observation of close acquaintances, but rather in the “fundamental attribution error”. If this is right, then philosophers cannot rely on their intuitions for insight into characterological psychology, and it might even be that there is no such thing as character. Thi...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Political Science Quarterly
سال: 1935
ISSN: 0032-3195
DOI: 10.2307/2143758